Adult Attachment for Reconstructing Adolescents’ Learning Identity and Awareness

Ratna Sari Dewi, Nurhayati Nurhayati

Abstract


This study explored how adolescents reconstructed their roles as learners through learning identity and awareness by adult involvement in Sukma Bangsa Pidie (SBP) School. In order to monitor students’ attitudes and learning aspects’ progress, this research employed several observations and interviews (groups and individuals) either by videotaping or voice recording, also students’ database records from school information system (called SISTO). The previous findings advocated that there were variations in the way adolescents performed their learning identity that might encourage them to achieve different degrees of motivation, self-perceptions (self-efficacy, self-concept, and self-esteem), autonomy, and self-development towards their identity as learners. In the other study, the authors also found that students in SBP School were in various categories regarding their levels of learning awareness. It was exhibited by how students dealt with their own learning approaches and how high their existing willingness to learn was. The different levels of learning awareness were survival, establishing stability, approval, and loving to learn. Both learner identity and learner awareness level were almost similar in the way that adolescents experienced. As argued by previous well-known researchers, the child would grow as a good learner with positive improvement of self-concept and self-esteem. Also, the formation of positive self-esteem in adolescence became a bridge towards their success as demanding learners. Furthermore, adult (in this case teachers and parents) involvement with adolescents’ learning approaches may embolden the learners to become less or more autonomous people. Positive adult attachment therefore is pivotal to moderate students who have either low willingness to study or low self-conception. This study ultimately confirmed that there was a reciprocal relationship between learner identity (motivation, self-perceptions, autonomy, self-development) and learner awareness (survival, establishing stability, approval, loving to learn), then further will support the integrated effects on learner autonomy.

Keywords


adult attachment; identity; awareness; adolescent; learner; positioning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adamson, L., Hartman, S. G., & Lyxell, B. 1999. “Adolescent identity – A qualitative approach: Self-concept, existential questions and adult contacts.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 21-31.

American Psychologist Association. 2002. “Developing adolescents: A reference for professionals.”

Andrade, H & Du, Y. 2007. “Students responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 32(2), 159-181.

Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.” Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. 1977. “Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change.” Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1-4, 287-310.

Bartholomew, K. 1990. “Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(2), 147-178.

Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. 1991. “Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226.

Baumeister, R. F. 1999. “Self-concept, self-esteem, and identity.”

Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. 2003. “Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?” Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1-40.

Bowlby, J. & Ainsworth, M. 1969. “Attachment theory.”

Bosnjak, L., & Winkelman, C. 2003. “The contribution of attachment style to identity formation in late adolescence.” In K.A. Moore (Ed.), Relationships: Family; Work and Community. Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian Psychology of Relationships Conference. (pp. 1-6). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Psychological Society.

Choy, S. C., Goh, P. S. C., & Liew, Y. L. 2015. “Learner awareness levels questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation of the English and Malay versions to measure how and why students learn.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 9(10), 3180-3184.

Choy, S. C., Goh, P. S. C., & Sedhu, D. S. 2016. “How and why students learn: Development and validation of the learner awareness levels questionnaire for higher education students.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(1), 94-101.

Coll, C., & Falsafi, L. 2010. “Learner identity. An educational and analytical tool La identidad de aprendiz.” Una herramienta educativa y analítica. Identidad y Educación, 353, 211-233.

Falsafi, L. 2010. “Learner identity: A sociocultural approach to how people recognize and construct themselves as learners.” (Doctorado interuniversitario de psicologia de la educacion. Doctoral thesis. Universidad de Barcelona).

Hamman, D., & Hendricks, C. B. 2005. The role of the generations in identity formation: Erikson speaks to teachers of adolescents. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 79(2), 72-75.

Harré, R. 2004. “Positioning theory.”

Harré, R., Moghaddam, F. M., Cairnie, T. P., Rothbart, D., & Sabat, S. R. 2009. “Recent advances in positioning theory.” Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 5-31.

Harrison, R. 1978. “How to design and conduct self-directed learning experiences2. Group & Organization Management, 3(2), 149-167.

Hiemstra, R. 1994. “Self-directed learning.” The Sourcebook for Self-directed Learning, 9-20.

Hirano, E. (2011). Learning difficulty and learner identity: A symbiotic relationship. ELT journal, 63(1), 33-41.

van Langenhove, L. & Harré, R. 1999. ”Introducing positioning theory.” In Harré, R., van Langenhove, L., & Bermann, L. Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. (pp. 14-31). British Library, UK: Blackwell Publisher Ltd.

Larsson. J. & Holmstrom. I. 2007. “Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: Does it matter? Examples from a study on anesthesiologists’ work.” International Journal od Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2, 55-64.

Lewis, T. 2006. “When teaching is learning: A personal account of learning to teach online.” Calico Journal, 581-600.

Matthews, J. S., Banerjee, M., & Lauermann, F. 2014. “Academic identity formation and motivation among ethnic minority adolescents: The role of the “self” between internal and external perceptions of identity.” Child Development, 85(6), 2355-2373.

Reeve, J., & Jang, H. 2006. “What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209

Schunk, D. H. 1991. “Self-efficacy and academic motivation.” Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 207-231.

Spiller, D. 2012. “Assessment matters: Self-assessment and peer assessment.” Teaching Development Unit.

Song, L., & Hill, J. R. 2007. “A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42.

Tirado, F., & Gálvez, A. 2008. “Positioning theory and discourse analysis: Some tools for social interaction analysis.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 224-251.

Nurhayati, RS Dewi, P Räihä, E Ropo. 2017. “Adolescents’ Identity Formation as Learners in Sukma Bangsa School Pidie, Aceh, Indonesia.” Sukma: Jurnal Pendidikan 1 (2), 249-280.

RS Dewi, Nurhayati, P Räihä, E Ropo. 2018. “What leads adolescent confused with their learning identity in Sukma Bangsa Pidie (SBP) School.” Technology-Enhanced Assessment Conference.

Reeve, J., & Jang, H. 2006. “What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209.

Riley, P. 2011. “Attachment theory and the teacher-student relationship: A practical guide for teachers, teacher educators and school leaders.” Routledge.

Nurhayati, RS Dewi, P Räihä, E Ropo. 2018. “Reconstructing Learners' Identity through Learning Awareness of Adolescents in Sukma Bangsa Pidie (SBP) School.” Technology-Enhanced Assessment Conference.

Nurhayati and RS Dewi. 2017. “An Analysis of Adolescents’ Identity Positioning as Learners in Sukma Bangsa Pidie. School.” Master Thesis in University of Tampere.

Vagan, A. 2011. “Towards a sociocultural perspective on identity formation in education.” Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18(1), 43-57.

Yamakawa, Y., Forman, E., & Ansell, E. 2005. “Role of positioning.”




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32533/03101.2019

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Ratna Sari Dewi, Nurhayati Nurhayati